From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753523AbbC3OdD (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:33:03 -0400 Received: from resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.38]:47338 "EHLO resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753107AbbC3OcV (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:32:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:32:19 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: Steven Rostedt cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , stable@vger.kernel.org, Uwe Kleine-Koenig Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 1/4] ring-buffer: Replace this_cpu_*() with __this_cpu_*() In-Reply-To: <20150330093720.6bfbf82f@gandalf.local.home> Message-ID: References: <20150325130011.709478161@goodmis.org> <20150325130037.896265791@goodmis.org> <20150327161133.505d4074@gandalf.local.home> <20150330093720.6bfbf82f@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Hmm, I didn't realize there was an "and" version. I'm guessing this > would bring down the instruction count even more? Yes two segment prefixed instructions and a decrement.