From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934456AbbDWOBI (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:01:08 -0400 Received: from resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.34]:60520 "EHLO resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757144AbbDWOBF (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:01:05 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:01:02 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: Andy Lutomirski cc: Jarkko Sakkinen , Andrew Lutomirski , "Ted Ts'o" , Andrew Morton , "Andrew G. Morgan" , Linux API , Mimi Zohar , Michael Kerrisk , Austin S Hemmelgarn , linux-security-module , Aaron Jones , Serge Hallyn , LKML , Markku Savela , Kees Cook , Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [RFC] capabilities: Ambient capabilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <933931146caf5dac58379f50c017bff9f6c47661.1426183417.git.luto@kernel.org> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > I'll submit a new version this week with the securebits. Sorry for the delay. > Are we going to get a new version? Replying to my own here. Cant we simply use the SETPCAP approach as per the patch I posted?