From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966892AbbDXUNf (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:13:35 -0400 Received: from resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.43]:56794 "EHLO resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965662AbbDXUNd (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:13:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:13:31 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: Andy Lutomirski cc: Serge Hallyn , Jarkko Sakkinen , Andrew Lutomirski , "Ted Ts'o" , Andrew Morton , "Andrew G. Morgan" , Linux API , Mimi Zohar , Michael Kerrisk , Austin S Hemmelgarn , linux-security-module , Aaron Jones , Serge Hallyn , LKML , Markku Savela , Kees Cook , Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [RFC] capabilities: Ambient capabilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20150424175348.GL16377@ubuntumail> <20150424190935.GN16377@ubuntumail> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > That's sort of what my patch does -- you need CAP_SETPCAP to switch > the securebit. > > But Christoph's patch required it to add caps to the ambient set, right? Yes but you seem to be just adding one additional step without too much of a benefit because you still need CAP_SETPCAP.