From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
Ronny Meeus <ronny.meeus@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Handle priority boosted tasks proper in setscheduler()
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 18:08:01 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1505051806060.4225@nanos> (raw)
Ronny reported that the following scenario is not handled correctly:
T1 (prio = 10)
lock(rtmutex);
T2 (prio = 20)
lock(rtmutex)
boost T1
T1 (prio = 20)
sys_set_scheduler(prio = 30)
T1 prio = 30
....
sys_set_scheduler(prio = 10)
T1 prio = 30
The last step is wrong as T1 should now be back at prio 20.
commit c365c292d0590 "sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()"
only handles the case where a boosted tasks tries to lower its
priority.
Fix it by taking the new effective priority into account for the
decision whether a change of the priority is required.
Reported-by: Ronny Meeus <ronny.meeus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 10 ++++++----
kernel/sched/core.c | 11 +++++------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -265,15 +265,17 @@ struct task_struct *rt_mutex_get_top_tas
}
/*
- * Called by sched_setscheduler() to check whether the priority change
- * is overruled by a possible priority boosting.
+ * Called by sched_setscheduler() to get the priority which will be
+ * effective after the change.
*/
int rt_mutex_check_prio(struct task_struct *task, int newprio)
{
if (!task_has_pi_waiters(task))
- return 0;
+ return newprio;
- return task_top_pi_waiter(task)->task->prio <= newprio;
+ if (task_top_pi_waiter(task)->task->prio <= newprio)
+ return task_top_pi_waiter(task)->task->prio;
+ return newprio;
}
/*
Index: tip/kernel/sched/core.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ tip/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3414,7 +3414,7 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct t
int newprio = dl_policy(attr->sched_policy) ? MAX_DL_PRIO - 1 :
MAX_RT_PRIO - 1 - attr->sched_priority;
int retval, oldprio, oldpolicy = -1, queued, running;
- int policy = attr->sched_policy;
+ int new_effective_prio, policy = attr->sched_policy;
unsigned long flags;
const struct sched_class *prev_class;
struct rq *rq;
@@ -3596,15 +3596,14 @@ change:
oldprio = p->prio;
/*
- * Special case for priority boosted tasks.
- *
- * If the new priority is lower or equal (user space view)
- * than the current (boosted) priority, we just store the new
+ * Take priority boosted tasks into account. If the new
+ * effective priority is unchanged, we just store the new
* normal parameters and do not touch the scheduler class and
* the runqueue. This will be done when the task deboost
* itself.
*/
- if (rt_mutex_check_prio(p, newprio)) {
+ new_effective_prio = rt_mutex_check_prio(p, newprio);
+ if (new_effective_prio == oldprio) {
__setscheduler_params(p, attr);
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);
return 0;
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-05 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-05 16:08 Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2015-05-05 16:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-05 16:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-05 16:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-05 16:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-05 17:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-05 17:49 ` [PATCH V2] " Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-05 20:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-08 13:18 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1505051806060.4225@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ronny.meeus@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®