mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Benoit Cousson <bcousson@baylibre.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH v2 0/9] x86: remove cpu_**_mask() functions
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 15:17:57 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1505191515500.4225@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432023553-2796-1-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>

On Tue, 19 May 2015, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

> Two functions defined in asm/smp.h: cpu_sibling_mask() and cpu_core_mask(),
> have the same functionality as macros defined in linux/topology.h:
> topology_thread_cpumask() and topology_core_cpumask() respectively.
> 
> They are not documented and are architecture specific. Also: different
> naming for the same functionality (in case of cpu_sibling_mask() and
> topology_thread_cpumask()) is a bit misleading.
> 
> This series makes all the callers switch to using the topology.h macros
> and removes their smp.h counterparts. While we're at it: rename
> topology_thread_cpumask() to topology_sibling_cpumask() to be
> consistent with the term used in the scheduler.
> 
> The same duplication exists on powerpc.
> 
> NOTE: patch 2/9 had been already submitted separately but didn't
> receive any attention, so I'm attaching it to this series.

As this touches the world and some more, I think it should go through
Andrews mm tree.

Andrew, can you please pick that up?

For the x86 parts: Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Thanks,

	tglx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-19 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-19  8:19 Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-19  8:19 ` [RESEND][PATCH v2 1/9] topology: rename topology_thread_cpumask() Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-19  8:19 ` [RESEND][PATCH v2 2/9] Documentation: update cputopology.txt Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-19  8:19 ` [RESEND][PATCH v2 3/9] coretemp: replace cpu_sibling_mask() with topology_sibling_cpumask() Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-19  8:19 ` [RESEND][PATCH v2 4/9] powernow-k8: replace cpu_core_mask() with topology_core_cpumask() Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-19  8:19 ` [RESEND][PATCH v2 5/9] p4-clockmod: replace cpu_sibling_mask() with topology_sibling_cpumask() Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-19  8:19 ` [RESEND][PATCH v2 6/9] acpi-cpufreq: replace cpu_**_mask() with topology_**_cpumask() Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-19  8:19 ` [RESEND][PATCH v2 7/9] speedstep-ich: replace cpu_sibling_mask() with topology_sibling_cpumask() Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-19  8:19 ` [RESEND][PATCH v2 8/9] x86: replace cpu_**_mask() with topology_**_cpumask() Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-19  8:19 ` [RESEND][PATCH v2 9/9] x86: remove cpu_sibling_mask() and cpu_core_mask() Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-19 11:56 ` [RESEND][PATCH v2 0/9] x86: remove cpu_**_mask() functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-19 13:17 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2015-05-26 13:14   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-05-26 13:11 Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-27 13:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-12  8:27 Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1505191515500.4225@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®