From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] clockevents: Hide CLOCK_EVT_STATE_* from rest of the kernel
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 16:20:42 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1505201618130.4225@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150520140411.GB22904@linux>
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> So, probably we are left with following choices:
>
> - Maintain state internally within the driver. SMP cases need per-cpu
> storage as clkevt devices are per-cpu. Probably that's a NONO as
> well ?
>
> - Use CLK_EVT_STATE_* directly in drivers (similar to the way we use
> CLK_EVT_MODE_* today).
>
> - Write the routines I proposed as macros or inline functions in
> clockchips.h, and use them. Of course that wouldn't stop exposing
> CLK_EVT_STATE_* to rest of the kernel.
I don't think that there is anything wrong with letting drivers access
it. We can make it a little bit harder to do it without accessor
functions, like I did with the state in irq_data: state_use_accessors
and have inline helpers to access it.
That makes it simple to grep for abusers :)
Thanks,
tglx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-20 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-20 9:06 Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 9:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] clockevents: Move 'enum clock_event_state' to tick-internal.h Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 9:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] clockevents: Add helpers to verify state of a clockevent device Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 13:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] clockevents: Hide CLOCK_EVT_STATE_* from rest of the kernel Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-20 14:04 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 14:20 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1505201618130.4225@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®