mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clockevents: return error from tick_broadcast_oneshot_control if !GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:50:40 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1506261346090.4037@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <558D36BC.6090502@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> On 06/26/2015 01:17 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> >> What about the case where GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST=y and
> >> TICK_ONESHOT=n (HZ_PERIODIC=y) ? Have you tested this ?
> >>
> >> This will hang the kernel at boot if you are using the hrtimer mode of
> >> broadcast. This is because the local timers of all cpus are shutdown
> >> when the cpuidle driver registers itself, on finding out that there are
> >> idle states where local tick devices stop. The broadcast tick device is
> >> then in charge of waking up the cpus at every period. In hrtimer mode of
> >> broadcast, there is no such real device and we hang.
> > 
> > Hmm, no. tick-broadcast-hrtimer.o depends on TICK_ONESHOT=y. So this
> > is covered by the check for the broadcast device, which is NULL.
> > 
> > But there is another variant:
> > 
> > GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST=y TICK_ONESHOT=y and 'highres=off
> > nohz=off' on the kernel command line. 
> 
> Can this happen at all? It is during tick_init_highres() or
> tick_nohz_switch_to_nohz() that we switch to oneshot mode, not otherwise
> AFAICT.

And how does that matter? If 'highres=off nohz=off' is on the kernel
command line none of the switchovers happens. So system stays in
periodic mode and the broadcast hrtimer thing is registered, right?
 
> I was actually talking of the following scenario. In periodic mode,
> where GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST=y, the arch can execute
> tick_setup_hrtimer_broadcast(), which will return nothing as you point
> out above. So there is no broadcast clockevent device.
> 
> When the cpuidle driver registers with the cpuidle core however,
> cpuidle_setup_broadcast_timer() on every cpu is executed if it finds
> that there is an idle state where ticks stop.
> 
> cpuidle_setup_broadcast_timer()
>   tick_broadcast_enable()
>     tick_broadcast_control(BROADCAST_ON)
>        bc = tick_broadcast_device.evtdev which is NULL in this case
> 
>          TICK_BROADCAST_ON:
>          checks for periodic mode of the broadcast device - succeeds
>          although we haven't registered a broadcast device because
>          value of TICKDEV_PERIODIC is 0, the default value of td.mode.
> 
>          clockevents_shutdown(dev)
> 
> At this point all cpus stop.

Right. That's a different one, if tick_broadcast_device.evtdev == NULL.

We should not stop any cpu local timer in that case. Combined with the
patch I sent, we prevent the idle stuff from going into a state where
the cpu local timers stop.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-26 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-25 10:27 Sudeep Holla
2015-06-25 13:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-06-25 15:30   ` Sudeep Holla
2015-06-26  5:08     ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-26  7:47       ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-06-26 11:25         ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-26 11:50           ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2015-06-26 12:37             ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-26 12:34         ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-26 12:38           ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-06-26 12:46             ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-07-01  9:08             ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-06-26 12:58           ` Sudeep Holla
2015-06-26  8:38       ` Sudeep Holla
2015-06-26  4:59   ` Preeti U Murthy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1506261346090.4037@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®