From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753391AbbIAQGJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 1 Sep 2015 12:06:09 -0400
Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:54023 "EHLO
	Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750949AbbIAQGH (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 1 Sep 2015 12:06:07 -0400
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 18:05:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] irq updates for 4.3
In-Reply-To: <55E48529.5070907@roeck-us.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509011801570.15006@nanos>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1508311200080.15006@nanos> <20150901021246.0ace2c6d@canb.auug.org.au> <55E48529.5070907@roeck-us.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0
X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: -
X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required,  ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001,URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 08/31/2015 09:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> > 
> > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:04:37 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner
> > <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Marc Zyngier (23):
> > >        irqchip/GIC: Convert to EOImode == 1
> > 
> > This appears to lead to qemu arm boot tests silently failing (according
> > to Guenter).  This commit only appeared in next-20150831.
> > 
> 
> I think we really need more time between patches showing up in -next and
> being pushed upstream. We have several new failures in -next which were
> introduced after next-20150828, with this being the most serious one.

Sorry about that. I usally let stuff breed long enough in next, but I
made an exception on this one. I tested it on several ARM boards
myself and certainly did not expect that there are still non
devicetree (or ACPI) based systems utilizing the GIC out there. I
certainly did not think about qemu ...

Thanks,

	tglx