From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753100AbbIATRh (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2015 15:17:37 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:56969 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750778AbbIATRg (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2015 15:17:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 21:17:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Linda Knippers cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/x86/mm/srat: Print non-volatile flag in SRAT In-Reply-To: <20150901162155.GB3418@ljkz400> Message-ID: References: <20150901162155.GB3418@ljkz400> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Linda Knippers wrote: > Nobody checks this flag but it would be interesting to know if it's being > set on any platforms. What you're omitting to explain, is WHY it would be interesting. Thanks, tglx