From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752015AbbIGKLB (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2015 06:11:01 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:38189 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751035AbbIGKK6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2015 06:10:58 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 12:10:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ingo Molnar cc: Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users , Carsten Emde , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , John Kacur , Paul Gortmaker , Peter Zijlstra , Clark Williams , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH RT 0/3] RT: Fix trylock deadlock without msleep() hack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20150904011900.730816481@goodmis.org> <20150905120457.GA21338@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 7 Sep 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > 1) The boosting is not related to anything. > > If the priority of taskB changes then nothing changes the boosting > of taskA. > > 2) The boosting stops Scratch that #2. Hit send too fast. #1 and #3 still hold. Thanks, tglx