From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme@xora.org.uk>,
Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] genirq: irqdomain: Remove irqdomain dependency on struct device_node
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:00:26 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509161040590.3951@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55F91F07.3040807@arm.com>
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 16/09/15 02:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > I've just seen quite a few bugs where a pointer to something completely invalid
> > have been silently passed via (void *) which often results in very interesting
> > breakage (that is really hard to debug for that matter).
>
> I actually tried to prototype this yesterday, and ended up in hell. The
> main issue is the point where the generic irqdomain code meets the DT
> subsystem (which is basically any interrupt controller, including those
> being ACPI driven). The domain_token to of_node path is dead easy, but
> you cannot do the reverse conversion, so this would have to spread
> around like a cancer. I gave up.
>
> At this stage, I see two options: sticking with (void *) with the risk
> of breakage and subtle bugs which we all love to track down (not!), or
> do a major U-turn and make device_node a strict requirement for domain
> lookup.
>
> After the above experiment, I now see some value in actually keeping
> device_node around, using it as the token, and allocating it when
> required (the typical case being those interrupt controllers that are
> both DT and ACPI). I'll play with it a bit more.
Right. We already have the fwnode_type in struct device_node, so we
can reuse it. If you care about the size of the struct, then you can
make some of the struct members conditional on CONFIG_OF.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-16 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-14 16:43 [PATCH v3 0/8] Making the generic ACPI GSI layer irqdomain aware Marc Zyngier
2015-09-14 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] genirq: irqdomain: Use an accessor for the of_node field Marc Zyngier
2015-09-14 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] genirq: irqdomain: Remove irqdomain dependency on struct device_node Marc Zyngier
2015-09-14 23:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-15 9:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-16 1:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-16 7:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-16 9:00 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2015-09-16 12:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-15 10:58 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-15 12:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-15 12:08 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-15 12:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-14 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] genirq: irqdomain: Allow a domain to be identified with non-DT data Marc Zyngier
2015-09-14 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] genirq: irqdomain: Add irq_create_acpi_mapping Marc Zyngier
2015-09-14 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] acpi: gsi: Always perform an irq domain lookup Marc Zyngier
2015-09-14 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] acpi: gsi: Add acpi_set_irq_model to initialize the GSI layer Marc Zyngier
2015-09-14 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] irqchip: GIC: Switch ACPI support to stacked domains Marc Zyngier
2015-09-14 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] acpi: gsi: Cleanup acpi_register_gsi Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1509161040590.3951@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=graeme@xora.org.uk \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=jakeo@microsoft.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®