From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755260AbbI0KiF (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Sep 2015 06:38:05 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:56786 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755092AbbI0KiC (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Sep 2015 06:38:02 -0400 Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 12:37:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Davidlohr Bueso cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Will Deacon , "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/rtmutex: Use acquire/release semantics In-Reply-To: <20150924010642.GB10657@linux-uzut.site> Message-ID: References: <1442866676-10359-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> <1442866676-10359-4-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> <20150924010642.GB10657@linux-uzut.site> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > From: Davidlohr Bueso > > As such, weakly ordered archs can benefit from more relaxed use > of barriers when locking/unlocking. That changelog is not really helpful if someone is going to look at it half a year from now who doesn't have the background of the discussion leading to these changes. Thanks, tglx