From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753080AbbI3Oyi (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:54:38 -0400
Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:38563 "EHLO
	Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751539AbbI3Oye (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:54:34 -0400
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:53:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
        Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>, Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>,
        Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
        Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
        Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
        Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] net: mvneta: Switch to per-CPU irq and make
 rxq_def useful
In-Reply-To: <1443197378-30717-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509301650150.4500@nanos>
References: <1443197378-30717-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0
X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: -
X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required,  ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 25 Sep 2015, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> I also reorganized the series, the 3 first patches should go through
> the irq subsystem, whereas the 4 others should go to the network
> subsystem.
> 
> However, there is a runtime dependency between the two parts. Patch 5
> depend on the patch 3 to be able to use the percpu irq.

The first 3 are good to go from my side. To avoid merge window
dependencies, I'll create a branch irq/for-net with these 3 patches
and merge that into irq/core.

So if the network folks want to pick up the rest, they can merge in
that branch as well.

Thanks,

	tglx