From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756149AbbJALCw (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:02:52 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:60340 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752732AbbJALCt (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:02:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:02:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Dave Hansen cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/25] x86, pkeys: Add Kconfig option In-Reply-To: <20150928191818.3378A6C9@viggo.jf.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <20150928191817.035A64E2@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20150928191818.3378A6C9@viggo.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001,URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Dave Hansen wrote: > > From: Dave Hansen > > I don't have a strong opinion on whether we need a Kconfig prompt > or not. Protection Keys has relatively little code associated > with it, and it is not a heavyweight feature to keep enabled. > However, I can imagine that folks would still appreciate being > able to disable it. > > We will hide the prompt for now. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner