Re: [PATCH 1/2] irqchip/renesas-intc-irqpin: Remove obsolete platform data support

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 02:19:51PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Oct 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:51 PM, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc4 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore]
> > > >
> > > > config: arm-bockw_defconfig (attached as .config)
> > > > reproduce:
> > > >         wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > > >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > > >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > > >         make.cross ARCH=arm
> > > >
> > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > >
> > > >>> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7778.c:26:57: fatal error: linux/platform_data/irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.h: No such file or directory
> > > >     #include <linux/platform_data/irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.h>
> > > >                                                             ^
> > > 
> > > Please ignore. Legacy (non-DT) r8a7778/bockw support has been removed
> > > in arm-soc/for-next.
> > 
> > That creates a cross tree merge dependency. Bah!
> > 
> > I have
> > 
> >   26c21dd9885a: irqchip/renesas-intc-irqpin: r8a7778 IRLM setup support
> > 
> > in tip irq/core pending. That should not conflict with that one. So I
> > suggest, that the arm-soc tree carries that cleanup with my
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > 
> > If you have more changes coming up for irqchip/renesas-intc-irqpin we
> > probably need to take them through arm-soc as well.
> 
> I'm happy to take "[PATCH 1/2] irqchip/renesas-intc-irqpin: Remove obsolete
> platform data support" into the renesas tree with Thomas's ack and forward
> it to arm-soc for v4.4. Though I will need to finalise doing so in
> the next few days. I would also be happy to see these patches
> re-posted once the removal of Legacy (non-DT) r8a7778/bockw support has
> hit next.
> 
> Geert, is that your preferred course of action for this patch?
> And what about "[PATCH 2/2] irqchip/renesas-intc-irqpin: Remove
> intc_irqpin_priv.number_of_irq"?

If you want to take it now: Acked-by-me

There is also a new one against irqchip/renesas-intc-irqpin from Paul
Gortmaker, you probably want to pick that up as well.

Thanks,

	tglx