From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752679AbbJLT4B (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:56:01 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:46449 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751526AbbJLTz6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:55:58 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:55:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: "Theodore Ts'o" cc: Andy Lutomirski , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Paul McKenney , Christoph Lameter , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Weisbecker?= , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Chris Metcalf , Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [BELATED CORE TOPIC] context tracking / nohz / RCU state In-Reply-To: <20151012184051.GB29127@thunk.org> Message-ID: References: <20151012184051.GB29127@thunk.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > This thread had fairly intense discussion for two days, but then went dead. > > Do folks think this is worth discussing at the kernel summit? We can do it the same way as hch proposed for the irq affinity stuff. Just a short summary of the issue and then find a hallway slot with the involved folks. Thanks, tglx