From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756809AbbJVICl (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 22 Oct 2015 04:02:41 -0400
Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:58590 "EHLO
	Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756748AbbJVICa (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 22 Oct 2015 04:02:30 -0400
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:01:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags()
 removal
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510202123330.8159@nanos>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510221000260.4012@nanos>
References: <1445347435-2333-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20151020140427.GE3953@io.lakedaemon.net> <20151020160828.497fcc80@free-electrons.com> <20151020141736.GX32532@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510202123330.8159@nanos>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0
X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: -
X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required,  ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > I think Rob's patches need another review in light of this, to determine
> > how much breakage there is here, and a decision how to proceed made on
> > that basis.
> 
> I'll go over them tomorrow again and decide then what to do.

I went over them once more and the only affected wreck I found is the
armada one.

Thanks,

	tglx