From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932725AbbKMUMH (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:12:07 -0500 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:33708 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932456AbbKMUME (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:12:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:11:16 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Thomas Petazzoni cc: Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Tawfik Bayouk , Nadav Haklai , Lior Amsalem , Andrew Lunn , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Gregory Clement Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal In-Reply-To: <20151111092638.587a53a4@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: References: <1445347435-2333-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20151020140427.GE3953@io.lakedaemon.net> <20151020160828.497fcc80@free-electrons.com> <20151111092638.587a53a4@free-electrons.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thomas, On Wed, 11 Nov 2015, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Have you had the time to consider the proposed solution? For 4.3 we > implemented the quick work-around that consisted in clearing > IRQ_NOAUTOEN, but it's probably not a very good long-term solution. > > Don't hesitate to let me know if you'd like to see some modifications > to the proposed approach, or if you have a totally different approach > in mind. I'm not sure if we really need all that muck if we can just rely on that flag. I don't see the extra value, but you might have something in mind which does not jump into my face right now. Thanks, tglx