From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: yjin <yanjiang.jin@windriver.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
mingo@redhat.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jinyanjiang@gmail.com,
stable-rt@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RT PATCH] sched: rt: fix two possible deadlocks in push_irq_work_func
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:15:27 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1511150914240.3761@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5646BB4A.50307@windriver.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1089 bytes --]
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015, yjin wrote:
> On 2015年11月14日 12:25, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 10:53:18 +0800
> > <yanjiang.jin@windriver.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Yanjiang Jin <yanjiang.jin@windriver.com>
> > >
> > > This can only happen in RT kernel due to run_timer_softirq() calls
> > > irq_work_tick() when CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL is enabled as below:
> > >
> > > static void run_timer_softirq(struct softirq_action *h)
> > > {
> > > ........
> > > if defined(CONFIG_IRQ_WORK) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL)
> > > irq_work_tick();
> > > endif
> > > ........
> > > }
> > >
> > > Use raw_spin_{un,}lock_irq{save,restore} in push_irq_work_func() to
> > > prevent following potentially deadlock scenario:
> > Ug. No, the real fix is that the irq work is to be run from hard
> > interrupt context.
> But if so, we shouldn't call irq_work_tick() in run_timer_softirq(), right?
The work is marked IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ so it should be run from hard irq
context. We only run the work, which is not marked IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ
from the softirq on RT.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-15 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-14 2:53 yanjiang.jin
2015-11-14 4:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-11-14 4:40 ` yjin
2015-11-15 8:15 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2015-11-15 8:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-15 11:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-16 5:26 ` yjin
2015-11-18 15:56 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1511150914240.3761@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=jinyanjiang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable-rt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yanjiang.jin@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®