mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt: x86: extend signal send delay to 32 bit
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 15:35:36 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1512121533210.4336@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <566B275A.5070300@linaro.org>

On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, Shi, Yang wrote:
> On 12/11/2015 10:05 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > * Yang Shi | 2015-12-10 10:58:51 [-0800]:
> > > Signal send delay is just available for x86-64, x86-32 needs it too.
> > 
> > This is new, this was not the case earlier. New means since v4.0-rc1 which
> 
> Yes, it is. We didn't find this problem in earlier version kernel (I'd say
> 3.x).
> 
> > is when 959274753857 ("x86, traps: Track entry into and exit from IST
> > context") got merged.
> > Since now ist_enter() disables preemption in any case, our hacks to
> > conditional_sti_ist() are pointless and could be removed.
> 
> I'm supposed you will revert it and not need a revert patch from me.

Why do you think that reverting it is a good idea? Just because we can
or what?

No, we fix it up on the RT side.

Thanks,

	tglx

      reply	other threads:[~2015-12-12 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-10 18:58 Yang Shi
2015-12-11 18:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-12-11 19:43   ` Shi, Yang
2015-12-12 14:35     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1512121533210.4336@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=yang.shi@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®