mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	Harald Hoyer <harald@redhat.com>, Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>,
	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix for ADJ_SETOFFSET w/ ADJ_NANO
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 08:54:00 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1601220852430.3886@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56A166E7.3070601@osg.samsung.com>

On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 01/21/2016 04:03 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> > David Herrmann mailed me pointing out that one of the
> > changes that landed in 4.5-rc broke users of ADJ_SETOFFSET
> > when used with ADJ_NANO.
> > 
> > I've implemented a fix to this issue and also introduced
> > more unit tests to validate these going forward.
> > 
> > Thomas: Can you queue the first patch for tip/timers/urgent?
> > 
> > Shuah: The kselftests patch can wait to the next merge window
> > if you'd prefer.
> 
> Yeah. Probably it has to wait until the next merge window as
> this is a new test. I can pull this into linux-kselftest next
> after merge window closes.

We really should not delay selftests, especially if they have been written
along with a fix for a recently detected problem.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-22  7:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-21 23:03 John Stultz
2016-01-21 23:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] ntp: Fix ADJ_SETOFFSET being used " John Stultz
2016-01-22 11:06   ` David Herrmann
2016-01-22 11:06   ` [tip:timers/urgent] " tip-bot for John Stultz
2016-01-21 23:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] kselftests: timers: Add adjtimex SETOFFSET validity tests John Stultz
2016-01-26 15:39   ` [tip:timers/urgent] " tip-bot for John Stultz
2016-01-21 23:16 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix for ADJ_SETOFFSET w/ ADJ_NANO Shuah Khan
2016-01-22  7:54   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-01-22 14:56     ` Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1601220852430.3886@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
    --cc=harald@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kay@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®