mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
	Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk, allow different timestamps for printk.time
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 10:39:17 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1601271030590.3886@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56A7DC85.4070603@redhat.com>

On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 01/26/2016 03:34 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Just for the record: The fast timekeeper stops across the inner workings of
> > suspend/resume. But I think that doesn't matter much.
> 
> I've had to debug s/r before using the sysfs interface.  It is nice to have that
> with a proper timestamp because a lot of the failures are in the driver suspend
> and resume paths.  I could easily change the options to:

The timekeeper suspends/resumes in the syscore section, so the driver part is
not affected.
 
> 0 = disable
> 1 = local clock (which along with 0 would maintain the current state of things)
> 2 = monotonic
> 3 = real

Yes, that works.

Btw, you need to document, that REAL can occasionally provide a wrong value on
32bit machines in case that a concurrent update of the realtime offset happens
(settimeofday, leap seconds ...). That's because we access real_offset w/o the
seqcount protection. It's probably hard to achieve, but it might happen.

Thanks,

	tglx

      reply	other threads:[~2016-01-27  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-25 15:12 Prarit Bhargava
2016-01-26 20:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-26 20:52   ` Prarit Bhargava
2016-01-27  9:39     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1601271030590.3886@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pang.xunlei@linaro.org \
    --cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vvs@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®