mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: avoid premature success when changing page attributes
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:05:45 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1601271040330.3886@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56A6615E02000078000CAC96@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On Mon, 25 Jan 2016, Jan Beulich wrote:

Sorry, that changelog does not make any sense.

> Since successful return from __cpa_process_fault() makes
> __change_page_attr() exit early (and successfully), its caller needs to

That has nothing to do with a successful return from __cpa_process_fault().

__change_page_attr() always returns immediately after calling
__cpa_process_fault() no matter what the return code is.

> be instructed to continue its iteration by adjusting ->numpages.

And how is that instruction working?

> While this already happens on one of __cpa_process_fault()'s successful exit
> paths, the other needs this done similarly.

Why?

> This was in particular a problem when the top level caller passed zero for
> "checkalias" (becoming the "primary" value for the other two mentioned
> functions), as is the case in change_page_attr_set_clr() when the OR of
> "mask_set" and "mask_clr" equals _PAGE_NX, as e.g. passed from
> set_memory_{,n}x().

This is completely unparseable.

Can you please describe the failure and the solution in a way, which lets one
figure out what that means w/o studying the code in detail?

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-27 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-25 16:54 Jan Beulich
2016-01-27 10:05 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-01-27 10:44   ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-27 10:53     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-27 11:10       ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-27 11:21       ` [PATCH v2] " Jan Beulich
2016-01-28  8:42         ` Ingo Molnar
2016-02-02  8:46           ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-09 14:30             ` Ingo Molnar
2016-02-10  9:03               ` [PATCH v3] " Jan Beulich
2016-02-25  9:45                 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86/mm: Avoid " tip-bot for Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1601271040330.3886@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®