From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932074AbcBVMAg (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 22 Feb 2016 07:00:36 -0500
Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:33651 "EHLO
	Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754775AbcBVMAe (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 22 Feb 2016 07:00:34 -0500
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:59:17 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@intel.com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 13/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Clear all hardware state
 on exit
In-Reply-To: <20160222115827.GC6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1602221259020.2477@nanos>
References: <20160222110337.198341739@linutronix.de> <20160222110441.279798424@linutronix.de> <20160222115827.GC6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0
X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: -
X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required,  ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:06:52AM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > +static void __init uncore_exit_boxes(void *dummy)
> > +{
> > +	struct intel_uncore_type **types = uncore_msr_uncores;
> > +
> > +	while (*types)
> > +		__uncore_exit_boxes(*types++, smp_processor_id());
> 
> 	for (types = uncore_msr_uncores; *types; types++)
> 		__uncore_exit_boxes(*types, smp_processor_id());
> 
> > +}
> 
> You flipped to for() loops in the other places, figures this one should
> match?

Yes. Forgot about that one.