mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Harry Junior <harryjr@outlook.fr>,
	x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Cure live lock in irq_force_complete_move()
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 09:27:28 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1603120926310.3657@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160311223357.GA2544@intel.com>

On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, Luck, Tony wrote:

> With this patch applied my system survives me doing
> several rounds of:
> 
> # echo 0 | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/online
> # echo 1 | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/online
> 
> whereas without the patch the first of those went to
> 
> [152455.129604] NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 96
> [152455.136943] Kernel panic - not syncing: Hard LOCKUP
> 
> I'm not sure we care to optimize the cpu offline path, but I'll note here
> that taking all (but one) cpus offline took 52 seconds (for a hundred
> and mumble logical cpus).  Bringing them all back is just 4 seconds.

Yes. I noticed that as well. No idea where we waste all that time. I've put
that on the todo list of our ongoing hotplug refactoring work.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-12  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-11 20:19 Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-11 22:33 ` Luck, Tony
2016-03-12  8:27   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-03-12 10:58   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-12 15:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-12 19:56   ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1603120926310.3657@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=harryjr@outlook.fr \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@stratus.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®