From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751724AbcEKKQD (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2016 06:16:03 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:47682 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751475AbcEKKQB (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2016 06:16:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 12:14:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: "Dmitry V. Levin" cc: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , LKML , Milosz Tanski , Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: use compat version for preadv2 and pwritev2 In-Reply-To: <20160511084817.GA29823@altlinux.org> Message-ID: References: <20160511084817.GA29823@altlinux.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 11 May 2016, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > Similar to preadv and pwritev, preadv2 and pwritev2 need compat entries > in the 32-bit syscall table. So this is 2016 and we added a syscalls which require compat support. What's wrong here? Thanks, tglx