From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751993AbcFFOBj (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:01:39 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:33465 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751326AbcFFOBi (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:01:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 15:59:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Jungseung Lee cc: Richard Cochran , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix-clock: remove unneeded posix_clock_compat_ioctl() In-Reply-To: <1464771281-13248-1-git-send-email-js07.lee@samsung.com> Message-ID: References: <1464771281-13248-1-git-send-email-js07.lee@samsung.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, Jungseung Lee wrote: > posix_clock_compat_ioctl() is identical to posix_clock_ioctl(). > We don't need additional compat_ioctl in this time. > Remove posix_clock_compat_ioctl() and let posix_clock_ioctl() is in charge. Which will return -ENOTTY for all affected ioctls simply because the ioctls are not listed in the compatible list. Thanks, tglx