From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752700AbcGGThz (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:37:55 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:46217 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750985AbcGGThq (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:37:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 21:34:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Kees Cook cc: LKML , Rik van Riel , Casey Schaufler , PaX Team , Brad Spengler , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Michael Ellerman , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , "David S. Miller" , "x86@kernel.org" , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov , Mathias Krause , Jan Kara , Vitaly Wool , Andrea Arcangeli , Dmitry Vyukov , Laura Abbott , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , sparclinux , linux-arch , Linux-MM , "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] mm: Hardened usercopy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1467843928-29351-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> <1467843928-29351-2-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001,URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 Jul 2016, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 3:42 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > I'd rather make that a weak function returning 1 which can be replaced by > > x86 for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. That also allows other architectures to > > implement their specific frame checks. > > Yeah, though I prefer CONFIG-controlled stuff over weak functions, but > I agree, something like arch_check_stack_frame(...) or similar. I'll > build something for this on the next revision. I'm fine with CONFIG_CONTROLLED as long as the ifdeffery is limited to header files. Thanks, tglx