mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: vatikaharlalka@gmail.com,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: get_nohz_timer_target?
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:05:58 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1607081105260.4083@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160418133709.GA10358@localhost.localdomain>

On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Richard Cochran wrote:
> Looking at kernel/sched/core.c:get_nohz_timer_target(), I don't
> understand the change made in:
> 
>     commit 9642d18eee2cd169b60c6ac0f20bda745b5a3d1e
>     Author: Vatika Harlalka <vatikaharlalka@gmail.com>
>     Date:   Tue Sep 1 16:50:59 2015 +0200
>     nohz: Affine unpinned timers to housekeepers
> 
> After that change, the code now reads like this:
> 
> 	int i, cpu = smp_processor_id();
> 	struct sched_domain *sd;
> 
> 	if (!idle_cpu(cpu) && is_housekeeping_cpu(cpu))
> 		return cpu;
> 
> 	rcu_read_lock();
> 	for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
> 		for_each_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
> 			if (!idle_cpu(i) && is_housekeeping_cpu(cpu)) {
> --------------------------------------------------------------- ^^^
> Was this supposed to be 'i' instead?

Yes. Care to send a patch?

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-08  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-18 13:37 get_nohz_timer_target? Richard Cochran
2016-07-08  9:05 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-07-08 11:49   ` get_nohz_timer_target? Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-08 16:48     ` get_nohz_timer_target? Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1607081105260.4083@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=vatikaharlalka@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®