From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754785AbcFPVQK (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:16:10 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f196.google.com ([209.85.223.196]:34276 "EHLO mail-io0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754113AbcFPVQI (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:16:08 -0400 From: Vince Weaver X-Google-Original-From: Vince Weaver Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:16:04 -0400 (EDT) X-X-Sender: vince@macbook-air To: Vince Weaver cc: Huang Rui , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , Robert Richter , Jacob Shin , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Kan Liang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Suravee Suthikulpanit , Aravind Gopalakrishnan , Borislav Petkov , Guenter Roeck , Fengguang Wu Subject: Re: [REDO PATCH v7] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting mechanism In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1457502306-2559-1-git-send-email-ray.huang@amd.com> <20160616053802.GA7810@hr-amur2> <20160616055933.GA8522@hr-amur2> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 16 Jun 2016, Vince Weaver wrote: One more followup, if I run the benchmark a bunch of times I get this: 4,472,401.06 mWatts power/power-pkg/ 50,886,303.28 mWatts power/power-pkg/ 81,737,001.44 mWatts power/power-pkg/ 6,525.89 mWatts power/power-pkg/ 6,522.04 mWatts power/power-pkg/ 6,505.68 mWatts power/power-pkg/ 4,938,855.83 mWatts power/power-pkg/ 4,614,620.11 mWatts power/power-pkg/ 79,679,069.41 mWatts power/power-pkg/ 152,794,060.83 mWatts power/power-pkg/ 3,942,429.02 mWatts power/power-pkg/ 6,506.73 mWatts power/power-pkg/ 60,198,884.39 mWatts power/power-pkg/ I'd believe the 6W report as a value for how much the CPU is using. The others seem spurious. I guess I should go check the Errata for this chip. Vince