From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755659AbcFQP4h (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:56:37 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53]:35783 "EHLO mail-it0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755481AbcFQP4e (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:56:34 -0400 From: Vince Weaver X-Google-Original-From: Vince Weaver Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:56:31 -0400 (EDT) X-X-Sender: vince@macbook-air To: Borislav Petkov cc: Huang Rui , Vince Weaver , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Alexander Shishkin Subject: Re: [patch] events/amd/power add support for fam16h model30h In-Reply-To: <20160617103156.GA15997@pd.tnic> Message-ID: References: <20160616211218.GC4002@pd.tnic> <20160617100746.GC13900@hr-amur2> <20160617103156.GA15997@pd.tnic> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 06:07:47PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote: > > Agree with you. If the some chips are not stable, we can add a check > > to ignore them with family and model id. > > So if family 0x16 is not "stable" as you say, we probably should keep > the cpu_match array too. Has anyone actually verified that the fam15h excavator machines are producing "stable" results? I know on my fam15h piledriver machines the results returned by the drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c driver look questionable at best, which is what started my trying to figure this whole thing out in the first place. Vince