From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753341AbcITU4a (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:56:30 -0400
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:60546 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751124AbcITU42 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:56:28 -0400
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 22:54:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v7 00/23] adapt clockevents frequencies to mono clock
In-Reply-To: <20160916200851.9273-1-nicstange@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609202251290.5476@nanos>
References: <20160916200851.9273-1-nicstange@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 16 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:

> Goal: avoid programming ced devices too early for large deltas, for
>       details, c.f. the description of [21/23].
> 
> [21-23/23] Actually do the frequency adjustments.
> 
> Tested on x86_64 and next-20160916.

Have you ever measured the overhead of the extra work which has to be done
in clockevents_adjust_all_freqs() ?

Thanks,

	tglx