From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934016AbcIVNyR (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:54:17 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:38149 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754188AbcIVNyM (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:54:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:51:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Waiman Long cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso , Scott J Norton , Douglas Hatch Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] futex, doc: TO futexes document In-Reply-To: <57E3D739.60205@hpe.com> Message-ID: References: <1473187989-30402-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> <1473187989-30402-5-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> <57E3D739.60205@hpe.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Waiman Long wrote: > On 09/22/2016 06:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Sep 2016, Waiman Long wrote: > > > This patch adds a new document file on how to use the TO futexes. > > Documentation is nice, but the proper place for documenting this is the > > futex(2) man page. > > > > Thanks, > > > > tglx > > Yes, I will certainly send patch to update the manpages after the new futex > gets merged into the upstream kernel. Or should I do that in parallel? It won't get merged w/o a patch to the manpage which is accepted by the man page maintainer. Thanks, tglx