From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S934445AbcI0MTL (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:19:11 -0400
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:50017 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S933304AbcI0MTB (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:19:01 -0400
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:16:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [x86-tip] strange nr_cpus= boot regression
In-Reply-To: <ce643c0f-e5b3-d864-8e9a-116cbe945e58@cn.fujitsu.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609270811110.4915@nanos>
References: <1474892945.9232.23.camel@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609261327340.5483@nanos> <ce643c0f-e5b3-d864-8e9a-116cbe945e58@cn.fujitsu.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Dou Liyang wrote:
> In fact, it's my fault.
> I should re-base my patches after the commit c291b0151585 in time.

Definitely not your fault. As a maintainer I should have been more careful
and check whether Linus tree or x86/urgent has any modifications to that
area before applying your patches. 

> I learned a lot from it.

We all did. 

Thanks,

	tglx