From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934142AbcI2Ot6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:49:58 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:55718 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933863AbcI2Otv (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:49:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:47:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Peter Zijlstra cc: mingo@kernel.org, juri.lelli@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, xlpang@redhat.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jdesfossez@efficios.com, bristot@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 4/9] rtmutex: Remove rt_mutex_fastunlock() In-Reply-To: <20160926124128.067303597@infradead.org> Message-ID: References: <20160926123213.851818224@infradead.org> <20160926124128.067303597@infradead.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > There is but a single user and the previous patch mandates slowfn must > be rt_mutex_slowunlock(), so fold the lot together and save a few > lines. We might have to bring that back for RT, but ok :) Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner