From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S934007AbcI2Oym (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:54:42 -0400
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:55768 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S932221AbcI2Oyc (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:54:32 -0400
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:51:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, mingo@kernel.org,
        juri.lelli@arm.com, xlpang@redhat.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
        jdesfossez@efficios.com, bristot@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 5/9] rtmutex: Clean up
In-Reply-To: <20160926120943.6d685a2f@grimm.local.home>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609291051020.4825@nanos>
References: <20160926123213.851818224@infradead.org> <20160926124128.136301172@infradead.org> <20160926120943.6d685a2f@grimm.local.home>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> Can this be rephrased to: "Returns true if preemption has been
> disabled and a call to rt_mutex_postunlock() is required (which will
> re-enable preemption)"

I agree with Steven that the comments should be rephrased.

Thanks,

	tglx