From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933078AbcJQXFt (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2016 19:05:49 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:38774 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756779AbcJQXFt (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2016 19:05:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 01:03:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: "Luck, Tony" cc: "Yu, Fenghua" , "Anvin, H Peter" , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Stephane Eranian , Borislav Petkov , "Hansen, Dave" , Nilay Vaish , Shaohua Li , David Carrillo-Cisneros , "Shankar, Ravi V" , "Prakhya, Sai Praneeth" , Vikas Shivappa , linux-kernel , x86 Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 13/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add mkdir to resctrl file system In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3A20010B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <1476497548-11169-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> <1476497548-11169-14-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> <20161017215025.GA5702@intel.com> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3A20010B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Luck, Tony wrote: > > So how are we going to deal with that in the schematas? Assume the L3=16 > > and L2=8 case(no CDP). So effectively any write of L2 to CLOSID=0 will > > affect the setting of L2 in CLOSID=8. > > > > Will the code tell the user that L2 cannot be set for CLOSID >= 8? > > > > Will it print the setting of CLOSID - 8 for CLOSID >= 8 when you read the > > schemata file of CLOSID >= 8? > > The default and first 7 directories you make will have lines in schemata for > both L3 and L2. The next 8 will just have L3 (and won't let you add L2). > > > And of course this becomes very interesting when CLOSID 1 is deleted, then > > what happens to CLOSID 9? Not to talk about the case when CLOSID 1 is > > reused again. > > Deleting CLOSID 1 won't affect CLOSID 9. How so? CLOSID 9 is using CLOSID 1 L2 settings. Are we just keeping the L2 setting of CLOSID 1 around and do not reset it to default? > When you make a new directory that gets allocated CLOSID 1, it will have > both L3 and L2 lines. Now CLOSID 1 is reused and reset to all 1's per default and even if not then the operator will set a new L2 value and therefor wreckaging CLOSID 9. Thanks, tglx