From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1754623AbcJUGut (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 21 Oct 2016 02:50:49 -0400
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:50634 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1754137AbcJUGus (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 21 Oct 2016 02:50:48 -0400
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:47:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
        =?ISO-2022-JP?Q?=1B$B2+Es=1B=28J?= <huangtao@rock-chips.com>,
        Tony Xie <tony.xie@rock-chips.com>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Heiko_St=FCbner?= <heiko@sntech.de>,
        "broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
        Akihiro Tsukada <tskd08@gmail.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] timers: Fix usleep_range() in the context of
 wake_up_process()
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=W4qSXHywGNEg6tOq8WiC7cROME4g3SwTxkD7h7=NsvvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610210846140.4797@nanos>
References: <1476998490-4481-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610202326070.4938@nanos> <CAD=FV=W4qSXHywGNEg6tOq8WiC7cROME4g3SwTxkD7h7=NsvvQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Please wait for a full review and do not send out patches 5 seconds after
> > the first mail hits your inbox.
> 
> Since you had previously commented on patch 1 and had already
> commented on patch 2, I presumed you were done reviewing, but I was
> obviously in error.  My apologies.

No problem. As a general rule you should not send updates like a machine
gun. That issue is years old, so there is no rush to fix it just because
some random (probably out of tree) code trips over it.

Thanks,

	tglx