From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933463AbcKMLBW (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Nov 2016 06:01:22 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:37753 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933121AbcKMLBV (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Nov 2016 06:01:21 -0500 Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 11:58:38 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: David Carrillo-Cisneros cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel , "x86@kernel.org" , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , Kan Liang , Vegard Nossum , Marcelo Tosatti , Nilay Vaish , Borislav Petkov , Vikas Shivappa , Ravi V Shankar , Fenghua Yu , Paul Turner , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/46] perf/x86/intel/cmt: add per-package locks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1477787923-61185-1-git-send-email-davidcc@google.com> <1477787923-61185-6-git-send-email-davidcc@google.com> <20161111072156.GS3568@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 11 Nov 2016, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > I still have not figured out why all of this is necessary and unfortunately > > there is no real coherent epxlanation of the overall design. The cover > > letter is not really helpful either. > > Note taken. I'll work on that. The first thing which would be helpful is a proper explanation of what you want to achieve and why, w/o going into design and implementation details. Thanks, tglx