From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933743AbcKPTTO (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:19:14 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:47003 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752015AbcKPTTM (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:19:12 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:16:25 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Corcodel Marian cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Realtek linux nic maintainers , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG] X86: Removing inline decl on arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h. In-Reply-To: <1479239164-7721-1-git-send-email-asd@marian1000.go.ro> Message-ID: References: <1479239164-7721-1-git-send-email-asd@marian1000.go.ro> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, Corcodel Marian wrote: > Inline declarations suppress warning message from compiler but > most of these functions was declared static and is not used local on file. Huch? This is a header file and the functions are marked inline on purpose. Can you please explain what you are trying to achieve and why you think that this is a good idea? Thanks, tglx