From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752581AbcLGLtc (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2016 06:49:32 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:42681 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751685AbcLGLt2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2016 06:49:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:46:12 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Pavel Machek cc: Len Brown , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86: remove idle_notifier In-Reply-To: <20161206165420.GA4406@amd> Message-ID: References: <20161206165420.GA4406@amd> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 6 Dec 2016, Pavel Machek wrote: > > From: Len Brown > > > > Upon removal of the i7300_idle driver, the idle_notifer is unused. > > Actually... do we want to keep this this one? There's "cpu is loaded" > led trigger, which is implemented on arm but not on x86. > > I tried to patch process.c, but this would be easier (and does not > require new hooks). > > Does that make sense? No. Notifiers are crap. I assume this LED thing is just for entertainment purposes as I cannot figure out why it would be useful. ARM has it does not qualify as useful. Thanks, tglx