From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754062AbdBIUPV (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2017 15:15:21 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:57902 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754004AbdBIUPU (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2017 15:15:20 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 21:14:25 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Stephen Hemminger cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov , "x86@kernel.org" , Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , KY Srinivasan , Haiyang Zhang , Dexuan Cui , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] hyperv: implement hv_get_tsc_page() In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20170209141052.18694-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20170209141052.18694-2-vkuznets@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The actual code looks fine, but the style police will not like you. > { should be at start of line on functions. > And #else should be at start of line, > > But maybe this was just more of exchange mangling the mail. Looks like. > +struct ms_hyperv_tsc_page *hv_get_tsc_page(void) { > + return tsc_pg; > +} > + That's how it reads in a proper mail client connected to a proper mail server: > +struct ms_hyperv_tsc_page *hv_get_tsc_page(void) > +{ > + return tsc_pg; > +} :)