From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751311AbdCYKZ5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Mar 2017 06:25:57 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:41098 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751054AbdCYKZ4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Mar 2017 06:25:56 -0400 Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 11:25:46 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Pavel Tatashin cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: [v2 0/9] Early boot time stamps for x86 In-Reply-To: <1490368899-877997-1-git-send-email-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> Message-ID: References: <1490368899-877997-1-git-send-email-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 24 Mar 2017, Pavel Tatashin wrote: > changelog > --------- > v1 - v2 > In patch "x86/tsc: tsc early": > - added tsc_adjusted_early() > - fixed 32-bit compile error use do_div() Did you actually read my last reply on V1 of this? I made it entirely clear that the way this is done, i.e. hacking it into the earliest boost stage is not going to happen. Further I asked you to hold off until I found some time to look into this in detail. So what's the point of ignoring what I said and resending the whole lot with some more hackery applied? I don't care about you wasting your time, but I very much care about my time. Thanks, tglx