From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:15:22 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703311104300.1780@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170329160825.GA24537@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > static int rdtgroup_cpus_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
> > - struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> > + struct seq_file *s, void *v,
> > + unsigned long flags)
> > {
> > + const char *fmt = flags & RFTYPE_FLAGS_CPUS_LIST ? "%*pbl\n" : "%*pb\n";
>
> Change to:
> + const char *fmt = strcmp(of->kn->priv, "cpus") ? "%*pbl\n" : "%*pb\n";
You couldn't come up with a more horrible hack, right?
Jiri was right with adding the flag to the base files, just the propagation
through the callbacks sucks. What's wrong with:
struct rftype *rft = of->kn->priv;
bool list = rtf->flags & RFTYPE_FLAGS_CPUS_LIST;
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-31 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-29 15:09 Jiri Olsa
2017-03-29 16:08 ` Fenghua Yu
2017-03-29 16:16 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-03-30 14:59 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-04-01 2:00 ` Fenghua Yu
2017-03-31 8:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-31 15:53 ` Fenghua Yu
2017-03-31 9:15 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2017-03-31 15:40 ` Fenghua Yu
2017-03-31 15:55 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-04-09 16:49 ` [PATCHv2] " Jiri Olsa
2017-04-09 17:38 ` Fenghua Yu
2017-04-10 7:40 ` [PATCHv3] " Jiri Olsa
2017-04-10 9:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-04-10 14:52 ` [PATCHv4] " Jiri Olsa
2017-04-10 17:16 ` [tip:x86/cpu] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2017-04-10 9:14 ` [PATCHv2] " Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1703311104300.1780@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®