From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932415AbdELIhf (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2017 04:37:35 -0400 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:48535 "EHLO mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932189AbdELIhb (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2017 04:37:31 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,328,1491256800"; d="scan'208";a="272807585" Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 16:37:23 +0800 (SGT) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: SF Markus Elfring cc: Joe Perches , Dan Carpenter , Stephen Hemminger , Wolfram Sang , Haiyang Zhang , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , devel@linuxdriverproject.org Subject: Re: Clarification for general change acceptance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <587dbcf5-8b12-fac7-693e-5f471e6d5167@users.sourceforge.net> <20170511093015.4cdfdb6c@xeon-e3> <20170512070909.xxa62d2cde3qoj4f@mwanda> <8d38547f-a086-438a-5b2a-4d11929530ec@users.sourceforge.net> <1494575540.2028.17.camel@perches.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > But I will come along source code places where I am going to update details > which are also trivial. When you make a patch, you are not obliged to eliminate all of the other checkpatch warnings on the file. I don't know where you got this idea from. The submitting patch guidelines don't say to do it, and no one else does it. You just need to ensure that your changes don't introduce new warnings, unless there is a good reason to do so. julia