From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751327AbdFDO07 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 4 Jun 2017 10:26:59 -0400
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:47996 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751159AbdFDO0w (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 4 Jun 2017 10:26:52 -0400
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 16:26:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
cc: mingo@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] rt_mutex: Add lockdep annotations
In-Reply-To: <20170531152019.612196435@infradead.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706041625310.2813@nanos>
References: <20170531151612.797882111@infradead.org> <20170531152019.612196435@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 31 May 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Now that (PI) futexes have their own private RT-mutex interface and
> implementation we can easily add lockdep annotations to the existing
> RT-mutex interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/rtmutex.h        |   25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
>  kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c |    6 +++++-

Shouldn't we get rid of all that home brewn rtmutex debug muck?

Thanks,

	tglx