From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751094AbdFTKPl (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2017 06:15:41 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:42863 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750863AbdFTKPj (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2017 06:15:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:15:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Len Brown cc: rafael@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86: do not use cpufreq_quick_get() for /proc/cpuinfo "cpu MHz" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1497668594-9266-1-git-send-email-lenb@kernel.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Len Brown wrote: > Issue 4 will remain -- users that really care about > accurate frequency information should not be using either > proc or sysfs kernel interfaces. > They should be using using turbostat(8), or a similar > purpose-built analysis tool. > > Signed-off-by: Len Brown Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner