From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752528AbdFTOOQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:14:16 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:44231 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752149AbdFTOOO (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:14:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:14:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Bartosz Golaszewski cc: Marc Zyngier , Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] irq: generic-chip: resource management improvements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1496246820-13250-1-git-send-email-brgl@bgdev.pl> <506628ed-7ca4-ce65-a738-7eb1f655bce6@arm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2017-06-20 12:41 GMT+02:00 Marc Zyngier : > > There was a kbuild report from June 1st with worrying warnings on x86_64 > > (though I couldn't see how that was related to these patches). What's > > the status of that? > > > > Thanks, > > > > M. > > -- > > Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... > > Snap, I looked at it, determined that it was just a header included in > include/linux/irq.h (unrelated to the patch) and forgot to comment > about it. > > I've never seen this warning on my setup and don't see it now with rc6. Yep, that's a genuine x86 snafu. No idea how that got attributed to your patch. Thanks, tglx