From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752218AbdFUW2O (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2017 18:28:14 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:52397 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750981AbdFUW2M (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2017 18:28:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 00:28:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Andi Kleen cc: LKML , Bjorn Helgaas , x86@kernel.org, Peter Anvin , Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] x86/pci: Switch to lockless ECAM configuration mode In-Reply-To: <20170613002536.GA21242@tassilo.jf.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <20170316215002.726697858@linutronix.de> <20170613002536.GA21242@tassilo.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi, On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:50:02PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Andi reported that the Intel Uncore performance monitoring suffers from the > > global pci_lock which protects the generic PCI config space accessors. > > > > This lock can be removed on X86 because all architecture specific config > > space accessors are either serialized by a seperate lock or can be > > converted to have their own locking. The mmconfig based access (ECAM) does > > not require serialization at the config read/write level because the access > > is a simple byte/word/dword read from or write to the memory mapped > > configuration space. In that case the lock does not provide any more > > protection than the hardware provides already. > > > > The series converts the CE4100 PCI low level accessors to use the x86 > > specific pci_config_lock and implements the switch over to lockless ECAM > > configureation space accesors when the system is capable. > > What's the status of this patch series? The lock contention > problem is still there. Just rechecked. It still applies and boots (patch 6/7) dropped. If Bjorn has no objections I can route it through tip tomorrow. Thanks, tglx