From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753803AbdIGF7q (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2017 01:59:46 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:50274 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752808AbdIGF7p (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2017 01:59:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 07:59:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Dan Williams cc: Christoph Hellwig , Yu Chen , X86 ML , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Rui Zhang , LKML , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Peter Zijlstra , Jeff Kirsher Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4][RFC v2] x86/apic: Spread the vectors by choosing the idlest CPU In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20170906041337.GC23250@localhost.localdomain> <20170906061545.GA20519@lst.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 12:13:38PM +0800, Yu Chen wrote: > >> I agree, the driver could be rewritten, but it might take some time, so > >> meanwhile I'm looking at also other possible optimization. > > > > Which driver are we talking about anyway? Let's start looking at it > > and fix the issue there. > > As far as I understand, it's already fixed there: > > commit 7c9ae7f053e9e896c24fd23595ba369a5fe322e1 -ENOSUCHCOMMIT > Author: Carolyn Wyborny > Date: Tue Jun 20 15:16:53 2017 -0700 > > i40e: Fix for trace found with S4 state > > This patch fixes a problem found in systems when entering > S4 state. This patch fixes the problem by ensuring that > the misc vector's IRQ is disabled as well. Without this > patch a stack trace can be seen upon entering S4 state. > > However this seems like something that should be handled generically > in the irq-core especially since commit c5cb83bb337c > "genirq/cpuhotplug: Handle managed IRQs on CPU hotplug" was headed in > that direction. It's otherwise non-obvious when a driver needs to > release and re-acquire interrupts or be reworked to use managed > interrupts. There are two problems here: 1) The driver allocates 300 interrupts and uses exactly 8 randomly chosen ones. 2) It's not using the managed affinity mechanics, so the interrupts cannot be sanely handled by the kernel, neither affinity wise nor at hotplug time. Thanks, tglx